Response to Objections to the Body and Blood

Response to Objections to the Body and Blood

Here I defend the Real Presence of Christ in Communion and answer the following ten objections against it:


1--Jesus was only speaking allegorically
2--Jesus was only pulling the wool over their eyes
3--Jesus couldn’t have meant it literally, since the Torah prohibits drinking blood
4--Jesus said, “Do this in memory of me,” so it is nothing more than memorial.
5--Jesus said we are saved by eating His flesh, so He can’t really mean eating flesh
6--Jesus broke bread with the apostles while He was still with us on earth. That could not possibly be His body and blood since He was sitting right there
7--Jesus elsewhere defined bread or food as something else
8--James White’s explanation – the crowds got it right.
9--If that were true, it would repeat breaking His body on the cross and go against Scripture
10--Jesus explained His words as allegorical in verses 62-64

You can find the text of this essay right here: https://www.holinessofthebride.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Response-to-Objections-to-the-Body-and-Blood.pdf

You can find it up on my Real Presence page at Holiness of the Bride right here: https://www.holinessofthebride.com/see-god-the-real-presence

To help us in our work toward holiness and reform in the Church: https://www.holinessofthebride.com/donate-2

My marriage book Get Married and Save the World is available here: https://www.xulonpress.com/bookstore/bookdetail.php?PB_ISBN=9781545659052&HC_ISBN=

Write me anytime at: kodeshkallah@yahoo.com

Suggested For You


Christian Podcasts


Related Videos