gregorythetruth's Blog

As a reminder, this web page is documenting a LONG STORY and SCRIPTURE CLAIM. Therefore, a person would likely want to fully comprehend the big picture before providing their USA expertise on one small part that they surely know little about. Also, the story does not have money behind it. Therefore, please do not judge my home-made video documentation as so. With a big budget, we could add special effects and provide Hollywood HD quality (and might if the truth is validated). At this point, however, We're documenting facts and truth behind the CLAIM STORY. Also, it is a claim about something covered in Scripture at SEVERAL PLACES (Rev Ch. 2, 3, 21). Either it IS or it ISN'T. In my opinion, you shouldn't rebuke a Scripture claim by pointing to other Scripture; unless you're equally educated on all of it. If someone could find a cure for the USA's need to RUSH TO WORDS BEFORE COMPREHENSION, it would mean peace and quiet for sum. Freedom of speech has a friend DOWN BELOW who likes to beat the clock.

In estimating the worth of this claim story and evidence, one needs to first assume all statements, data, facts, and dates are truth. This will allow you to arrive at a contingent conclusion such as, if everything outlined is verified as truth, then my estimate of the claim's worth is X. If you are reviewing the story facts with doubt and/or fear, you will never get an accurate read on the big picture. Take an accurate read assuming all is truth, knowing your read is contingent on everything being verified later. An accurate read will better define your future words and actions. I have been very careful not to deceive, knowing that any deception discovered will harm the claim's merit. This will surely be verified before any final conclusions.

It is clearly time for ALL clergy to make comments regarding the 1998 Document and Revelation 21:7 Claim. When asked, some clergy might be hearing about both for the first time. This is fine, as they can state this for the OFFICIAL RECORD. Hopefully, they will be interested in reviewing the evidence. Other clergy should truthfully state when they received the Document for the first time; who they've shared it with; and if/when they knew about the matching eclipses. In addition, they should truthfully answer other MEDIA QUESTIONS related to the 1998 Document and/or Revelation 21:7 Claim. The clergy should state how long they've known about the claim and evidence offered; along with what steps they've taken to respond. If they have taken no steps to respond, then they should state the reasons. If they are unwilling to look at the evidence because they decided it's not worthy, they should state that also. Everyone is entitled to their truthful opinion..no hard feelings on this end. Again, the possibility/discussion of MENTAL ILLNESS does not hurt my feelings either. Perhaps it is the truth. This recommendation applies to ALL CLERGY from the small church pastor over to the Pope; so there should be plenty of interview candidates. Some are clearly due for TV CAMERA EXPOSURE. Obviously, The Vatican, Tabernacle, and Denomination Headquarters will be a main starting point. We need to find out Father Paul's reasons for writing the letter in 2001 and then disappearing (during the "secret" meeting in Santa Fe). Some United Church of Christ clergy have seen about half of the current DVD list. We will need to know who reviewed and when; along with why they didn't ask any questions; as I offered to answer. And of course, we can't forget the experts at Episcopalia; starting with St. Anthony right here in Scottsdale. Using the term "vanishing binder" has likely raised suspicions of guilt; so a televised BIBLE OATH by all the staff; confirming they have absolutely no knowledge of its whereabouts; should clear their name and confirm it probably became invisible. This is more than fair...a confirmation of their previous statements to clear suspicions caused by the email blitz. There might be some confusion on how no inquiries and no questions equates to DVD reviews by U.C.C. and a few others. Through John's efforts, a handful of locations have been approached and provided some DVDs. In each case, these locations received a memo from me along with some key email evidence. Already knowing they are afraid of this topic and even more afraid to approach me, I had suggested they write a list of questions and return them via John. Nobody has responded to this invite.