Argument against evolution

Animals have a sense of self-preservation. They are not idiotic. The bird won't just smack into a tree like you say. Lets say two birds of the same species but different beak STRENGTHS (one beak harder than the other). Evolution is all about the more efficient animal being able to pass on hereditary traits (such the harder beak being able to drill into the tree). Animals need to adapt to survive whether they are hunters or prey. So, the bird with the harder beak survives because it can gather food while the bird with the softer beak does not. And why do we have such a vast array of animals of similar natures. Well, lets say the bird with the softer beak that can't get the food from the tree lives. This soft-beaked bird travels elsewhere and is able to find food that is suitable for it's physical nature. Both, birds are not hunting different prey and reinforcing their strengths through reproduction giving rise to new species. (Mutations also play an important role but that would just blow your mind!)

Video is so ridiculous you just have to laugh at it....way to spend an entire minute summing up your misinformed view of evolution. LOL

I really wish jesus freaks could understand how batshit crazy they sound to normal, rational thinking human beings.

"Only in the present"? Say wha? Everything we observe is in the "present" that doesn't mean what we observe can't explain the past. In the first 2 mins the entire video is discredited by those four simple words and is why you can't go around redefining science.

Science is only in the present? wow :) Gosh Charlie, nice spin on "irreducible complexity" , I'm sure you convince some people.. a mouse trap turning into mouse, lol, THAT would take a miracle (and disprove evolution). Well, have a great day anyway ;).